The Euro
Whether you recently became interested in international investing or are a seasoned global
investor, a quick refresher course on foreign bond investing should help you assess your
current strategy and future plans for the fixed income portion of your investment portfolio.
Q.
What are the primary factors affecting returns on foreign bonds for U.S.-based investors?
A. Many factors are the same as for U.S. bonds: interest rate levels, credit market conditions,
actual and expected inflation, and the pace of economic growth, to name just a few. Naturally,
a bond's price also reflects its particular characteristics, such as credit quality and maturity,
and also the supply and demand.
There are important differences between domestic and foreign bond investing that can increase
overall risk. Many countries have less political stability and less diverse economies than the
United States. Political or economic upheaval in such a country could jeopardize local bond
markets, so the investor must continually monitor and interpret the internal developments of
other countries. However, this risk can be greatly reduced by investing in government bonds of
developed nations.
The aspect of foreign investing that probably generates the greatest day-to-day concern is the
impact of currency translation. Initially, dollars must be converted to the local currency to
purchase a foreign bond. Subsequently, price quotations, interest, and any sale or redemption
proceeds must be converted from that foreign currency back into U.S. dollars. Because foreign
exchange rates fluctuate constantly with changes in each currency's supply and demand
situation, currency movements can increase or decrease the bond's dollar value (and
investment return) even if its price remains unchanged.
Q.
Given the added complexities, why invest abroad?
A.
A principal advantage of investing overseas is diversification. A diversified portfolio gives you
the opportunity to enhance your overall return while reducing risk. Interest rate movements in
foreign bond markets frequently do not correlate with those in the U.S. While interest rates in
one or more markets may at any time be moving in the same direction as U.S. rates,
longer-term correlations are low. Additionally, since interest rate levels can vary widely from
country to country, a diversified portfolio may also generate higher current income than one
invested in bonds of a single country.
Another reason to invest overseas is the potential for higher total return. In any given year,
some individual foreign bond markets are likely to outperform the U.S. bond market. Likewise,
foreign bonds as a group may generate higher returns than U.S. bonds in some years, but not
in others. On the other hand, if foreign bond markets underperform the U.S. bond market,
diversifying overseas could reduce an investor's total return. In any case, a diversified portfolio
should be cushioned from the full impact of potential losses when one market or the other has
a down year.
The chart below shows 12-month results from foreign and U.S. government bonds in recent
years. As you can see, performance leadership can vary from one period to the next. Over the
10-year period ending December 31, 1999, foreign bonds outperformed U.S. bonds on an
average annualized basis (8.34% versus 7.81%). Of course, a portfolio manager may obtain
significantly different results by investing in a mix of securities that differs from these indices.
Q.
Can you show how currency translation alters local market returns to U.S. investors?
A.
One way is to compare returns on a particular security, say German government bonds, to
local investors and to U.S. investors during identical time periods. As the table shows, German
bonds lost 1.8% for all of 1994, but a U.S. investor would have realized a solid 10% return on
the same bonds because the deutschemark rose nearly 12% against the dollar. In 1996 and
1997, however, the deutschemark fell in value against the dollar, reducing returns to U.S.
investors. In contrast, a weak dollar and strong German bond market performance in 1998
resulted in a gain of nearly 20% for U.S. investors.
|
Example: The Impact of Currency Fluctuations on German
Bond Returns for U.S. Investors |
|
Local
Market
Return |
|
Local
Currency Appreciation/Depreciation
vs. U.S. Dollar |
= |
Return to
U.S. Investors
|
| 1994 |
-1.8 |
|
11.8% |
|
10.0% |
| 1995 |
16.3 |
|
9.6 |
|
25.9 |
| 1996 |
7.3 |
|
-7.7 |
|
-0.4 |
| 1997 |
6.2 |
|
-15.2 |
|
-9.0 |
| 1998 |
10.9 |
|
8.9 |
|
19.8 |
| 1999 |
-2.1 |
|
-14.3 |
|
-16.4 |
Source: Salomon Smith Barney
This chart is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent an investment in any T. Rowe Price fund. Past performance cannot guarantee future results.
Q. Is there any way to reduce the risk
of unfavorable currency fluctuations?
A. Yes. Portfolio managers may use sophisticated hedging techniques involving forward
exchange contracts or options to cushion the impact of potentially negative currency
movements.
One type of hedge is called the direct hedge. For example, a U.S. investor buying a one-year
Japanese bond may enter into a contract to exchange yen for dollars a year later at a price
agreed upon when the contract is bought. This essentially eliminates changes in currency
values as an unknown in the investment process. While it may protect against a
currency-related loss, it also eliminates the possibility of gain from currency fluctuations.
The other type of hedge is called the proxy hedge. Continuing the previous example, a U.S.
investor using a proxy hedge would look for a currency that could be expected to move with
the yen and, therefore, could serve as a "proxy" for the Japanese currency. While a proxy
hedge can be more economical than a direct hedge, it is not risk-free because the proxy
currency may not behave as expected.
Mutual fund prospectuses spell out the types of hedges a fund can use, the expected
frequency of use, and the potential effects of hedging activity on a fund's total return. Since
hedging costs are treated as capital transactions, they are not reflected in a fund's yield but
rather in its net asset value.
Q. Should foreign investment decisions
be based on the outlook for the exchange
value of the dollar?
A. Currency translation can have considerable impact on performance, on the upside or the
downside, especially in a fund with substantial unhedged assets. Over long time periods these
effects tend to diminish. Investing in foreign bonds should be viewed primarily as a way to
diversify fixed income investments as part of an overall strategy rather than as a "play" on the
currency markets. Nevertheless, the impact of currency fluctuations must be taken into
account when selecting foreign bond investments. Currency fluctuations should have less
impact on a global fund holding U.S. dollar-denominated bonds than on a foreign bond fund
without such bonds.
Q. How does an investor choose
among the different types of overseas bond funds?
A. There are three major decisions to make:
1.between global and international funds,
2.between short- and longer-term funds, and
3.between funds investing in high-quality or lower-quality (high-yield) bonds.
"Global" funds invest worldwide, including in the U.S., and thus should incur significantly less overall currency risk. "International" funds usually exclude U.S.
investments except in the cash reserve position (typically under 10% of net assets).
"World" funds may or may not invest in the U.S.; consult the prospectus.
The short-term versus long-term decision should reflect your own objectives. As with all
fixed income investments, foreign bonds with shorter maturities have less interest rate
risk, meaning their prices fluctuate less than longer-term bonds in response to a given
change in overall interest rate levels.
The decision between a fund investing primarily in high-quality bonds and one
emphasizing lower-quality, high-yielding bonds depends on your desire for higher
returns versus your tolerance for additional risk. As discussed below, bond funds
investing in "emerging markets" offer the potential for significantly higher returns, but are more apt to sustain losses because of greater volatility.
So if minimizing risk is an important objective, you should consider global bond funds with
average maturities under five years. If you are willing to accept more day-to-day volatility in
exchange for potentially higher returns over time, you may wish to investigate longer-term
global or international bond funds, whose average maturities are usually five years or longer.
And if you want to take an aggressive risk/reward stance with a portion of your global bond
investments, you could diversify into an emerging market bond fund.
While you should always keep in mind the special risks of international investing, you should
also consider its significant advantages. Diversifying internationally or globally can help smooth
the fluctuations of your fixed income portfolio and can offer a way to take advantage of yields
that may be higher than in the U.S.
Investing in Emerging Market Bonds
Q. What are emerging market bonds?
A. Emerging market bonds are debt securities issued by governments and corporations of
countries described as "less developed" or "developing" by organizations such as the World
Bank. Developing countries have relatively low GNP per capita, and the credit quality of their
bonds is usually, though not always, below investment grade, or "junk" in the U.S. market
terminology. These bonds carry high yields to compensate investors for their additional risk.
Q. Are there different types of emerging market bonds?
A. Yes. There are three main types:
Local Bonds—Issued in local markets in local currencies, these usually offer the
highest yields since they involve the greatest credit and currency risk and may be the
least marketable.
Eurobonds—Issued by developing countries in the London-based Eurobond market,
these bonds may be denominated in any of several currencies, including U.S. dollars.
Brady bonds—Named after a plan devised by former Treasury Secretary Nicholas
Brady, these bonds are created when existing government or private debt is restructured and exchanged for new bonds, many of which are dollar-denominated and
backed by U.S. Treasury zero coupon bonds. The backing generally assures the
repayment of principal upon maturity, but does not apply to more than a few initial
interest payments, if any. Although currency and credit risk may be reduced, most
Brady bonds are still considered speculative investments.
Emerging market bonds can reward investors with very high yields and possibly significant
capital appreciation. Any favorable political or economic developments, including conversion
into Brady bond status, that are expected to improve a bond's credit quality may send its price
sharply higher.
Q. What are the risks of investing in emerging market bonds?
A. Investing in such bonds involves substantially greater risk than investing in higher-quality
foreign bonds. Prices of emerging market bonds can be severely affected not only by rising
interest rates and adverse currency fluctuations, but also by the deterioration of credit quality
or outright default by the issuer. Also, the low level of liquidity in emerging markets means that
potential buyers may stay on the sidelines during unfavorable market conditions until bond
prices are slashed.
Q. What should I know about emerging market bond funds?
A. Mutual funds offer a convenient way for individuals to access the
opportunities in many
developing markets. Funds are, in fact, the single largest source of demand for emerging
market bonds, so their cash inflows and outflows can increase the market's volatility.
However, not all emerging market bond funds are alike: some emphasize yield, some
appreciation, some both equally. Portfolio asset allocations can also vary significantly,
resulting in different risk profiles. If you can ride out price declines to pursue the potential of
this bond market frontier, be sure to select a fund whose objectives and program are
appropriate for your risk tolerance and investment time horizon.
The Euro
On January 1, 1999, several major European countries adopted the euro as a single European
currency backed by the European Central Bank. The currencies of the participating countries
have become fixed rate units of the euro, much the same as the nickel, dime, quarter, and
half-dollar are denominations of the U.S. dollar. The initial participating countries are Austria,
Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal,
and Spain.
At the outset, some European securities were redenominated in euros, particularly government
securities. The face value of other investments might remain in the existing national currencies
for a time, but they will be valued in euros by stock exchanges and other agencies. This
should not affect the investment values of U.S. mutual funds that invest in Europe, since the
euro is convertible into the dollar. Assuming all goes well, the national currencies of
participating countries will cease to exist by June 30, 2002, and all accounting thereafter will
be in euros.
Learn more about T. Rowe Price & Associates