Watching the World Cup in South Africa these past few weeks, I
realized there are many parallels between winning World Cup
soccer games and investing with an eye toward inflation
protection.
There
are times to be bold and aggressive in both World Cup soccer
and investing, but these moments are often fleeting and
unexpected. Just as with building long-term portfolios to
protect against the damaging effects of inflation, the most
successful soccer teams play excellent defense, cover the
entire field, and have patience.
In a previous article (“Inflation
vs. Deflation: Prepare for Either”), I discussed how
different investments have tended to track changes in the
Consumer Price Index (CPI), and analyzed the pattern of
12-month rolling asset class returns in periods of high and
low inflation. With its discussion of shorter time frames,
that article was geared toward helping investors weigh
near-term strategies for either inflation or deflation.
But what about longer-term options to help protect
investors’ portfolios from the insidious damage of long-term
price increases?
A long history of rising prices
From January 1926 to May 2010, there have been 894 rolling
10-year periods. Of these, prices (as measured by the CPI)
rose in 92% of the 10-year periods. However, the 69 periods
that saw negative inflation all occurred between 1935 and
1941. There have been no five-year periods with negative
inflation since 1937. So, unless the economy returns to the
dark days of the Great Depression, the trend over the past 70+
years suggests that prices will continue to rise.
The steady erosion of purchasing power from inflation is of
particular concern to investors who will need to rely on their
retirement savings to fund the bulk of their retirement income
needs. A long-term increase in inflation that is not at least
matched by an increase in portfolio returns can have serious
consequences for retirement income planning. Therefore, when
analyzing investment options specifically targeted to help
fund retirement income needs, it can help to focus on the real
performance of different asset classes—that is, investment
returns after subtracting the inflation rate. Before we delve
into long-term inflation protection options, keep in mind that
an investment’s demonstrated ability to react to changes in
inflation should be considered within the context of an
investor’s risk tolerance, time horizon, and investment
goals.
Keeping up with inflation protection
So, how should long-term investors emulate the best World
Cup soccer teams and play defense against rising prices?
Regardless of whether inflation is high or low, one of the
primary goals of any long-term inflation-protection strategy
is to outperform the rate of inflation—not necessarily
shooting for the goal at every chance and trying to achieve
the highest absolute returns. While past performance doesn’t
guarantee future results, there are two broad-based categories
of asset classes that have tended to hold up relatively well
during inflationary climates: financial securities that adjust
their return for inflation, and tangible, physical assets such
as commodities and real estate.
Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are designed
to adjust to changes in inflation.1 Commodities are
the raw materials input for many consumer
expenditures, such as food, fuel, cars, and housing, and may
offer some protection from the erosion of purchasing power
caused by inflation. Another potential source of inflation
protection is commercial real estate—such as apartment
buildings, office towers, and shopping malls—which can be
owned by individual investors through real estate investment
trusts (REITs). Real estate securities such as REITs can offer
inflation protection because changes in the CPI are often
factored into rent increases.
The inflation-fighting power of TIPS
The table below shows the average 10-year rolling real
returns, dating back to 1926, for 10 asset classes. If an
investor’s primary goal had been to achieve a positive real
return with the least amount of downside risk, then, not
surprisingly, the best choice would have been TIPS, had they
existed. Since being introduced in 1997, TIPS have had no
rolling 10-year periods where the real return was negative.
Also, the range of real returns were in a relatively narrow
band, with the lowest return over any 10-year period being an
average annual return of 3.0%; the highest average annual
return for any 10-year period was 4.7%.

While historical returns can provide some useful insights,
it is important to remember that past performance patterns may
not be repeated in the future. Further, TIPS have only been in
existence for a total of 13 years, so there is much less
history to analyze compared with the other asset classes on
this list. In addition, the total return on TIPS is a function
of both actual realized inflation and bond market investors’
expectations for future inflation. Therefore, over
shorter-time periods, changes in inflation expectations can
produce subpar or negative real returns even when the actual
rate of trailing inflation is positive. However, over longer
time periods (such as the 10-year rolling periods shown in the
table above), TIPS have performed as designed and have
provided inflation protection. Therefore, investing in TIPS
has clearly been beneficial for investors focused on
investments that have kept pace with inflation over the longer
term.
Commodities and real estate: Also
historically strong inflation-fighters
For others looking for inflation protection over a
longer-term horizon who are also willing to accept some degree
of volatility and risk, options such as real estate and
commodities have also demonstrated an ability to outperform
inflation.
From January 1972 to May 2010, real estate securities had
no rolling 10-year periods with a negative real return.
Further, the average annual real return for real estate
securities was 8.1%, more than twice that of TIPS. The next
two asset classes with the lowest percentage of rolling
10-year periods with negative real returns were commodities
(5%) and U.S. small-cap stocks (6%). Foreign stocks (12%),
U.S. large-cap stocks (15%), and high-yield bonds (15%) had a
similar amount of negative real return periods.
Bonds and T-bills: Historically better when
inflation is low or falling
Nominal bonds and Treasury bills have tended to
underperform inflation at a similar pace even as the time
horizon lengthens. The chart below shows that long-term
corporate bonds have done a worse job fighting inflation as
the time horizon grows longer. They had a positive real return
in 66% of the rolling 12-month periods, but in only 62% of the
rolling 10-year periods. Treasury bills outpaced inflation at
about the same rate, beating inflation in only 64% of both the
rolling 12-month and rolling 10-year periods.

However, before dismissing bonds as a subpar investment
vehicle for inflation protection, keep in mind that in
deflationary and low inflation environments, bonds have
performed well. In the deflationary period of the 1930s,
long-term corporate bonds were standout performers. This was
not a one-time historical aberration, as long-term corporate
bonds were the second-best-performing asset class (of the ten
analyzed in this paper) during the decade of the 2000s.
Further, when the rolling three-year return periods since 1974
are sorted into equal quintiles based on inflation rates,
long-term corporate bonds emerge as the top performer in the
lowest quintile of inflation.
Seeking inflation protection over the short
and the long term
Few people may have the nerve or conviction to wait 10
years for their portfolio results. So, it helps to look at how
different asset classes have protected against inflation
across shorter time lengths. The table below shows the
percentage of time that different asset classes have had real
returns greater than zero (positive returns after subtracting
the rate of inflation) across rolling 12-, 36-, 60-, and
120-month periods.

TIPS outperformed inflation the most frequently across both
short and longer-term time periods. The real total return for
TIPS was positive in 84% of the rolling 12-month time periods
and jumped to 96% for the rolling three-year periods. There
were no rolling five-year or 10-year periods where TIPS had a
negative real return. Of course, TIPS have only been in
existence for 13 years, so there is much less history to
analyze than with the other asset classes.
Real estate securities and commodities have also beaten
inflation over the longer term. Real estate securities
outperformed inflation in 100% and commodities beat inflation
in 95% of the rolling 10-year periods dating back to the
1970s. At least one caveat, however, should be kept in mind:
while real estate, commodities, small-cap stocks, foreign
stocks, large-cap stocks, and high-yield bonds all had a
positive real return in at least 85% of the rolling 10-year
periods, there was not much difference in their abilities to
beat inflation over the rolling 12-month periods; all had
positive real returns in only 64–69% of the rolling 12-month
periods.
Do you have a plan to defend against
inflation?
While investing in real estate or commodities may provide
some protection against the ravages of inflation, these asset
classes also expose participants to increased portfolio
volatility. Therefore, a sensible strategy is to make
potential inflation protection options as diversified as
possible—such as with a multi-asset-class real return mutual
fund. A multi-asset-class real return fund can offer exposure
to a variety of asset classes, including real estate
investment trusts (REITs), commodities, and TIPS. Combining
these investment categories into one fund still offers
potential protection against inflation, but with less
potential volatility than investing in a pure real estate or
commodities fund might.
At the moment, inflation does not look to be an immediate
concern. Substantial slack in the economies of the United
States and other developed nations is keeping a lid on upward
pricing pressures. However, as World Cup soccer has shown, the
time to mount a strong defense is not at the moment just
before the opposing team kicks a goal. Likewise, it pays to
plan ahead and consider your options well before the moment
when inflation has already arrived at the cash register.
© 2010 Fidelity Investor's Publications
Before investing in
any mutual fund, please carefully consider the investment
objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. For this and other
information, call or write Fidelity for a free prospectus or,
if available, a summary prospectus. Read it carefully before
you invest.
The information presented above reflects the opinions of Bill
Ralls, senior vice president of research, as of July 2, 2010.
These opinions do not necessarily represent the views of
Fidelity or any other person in the Fidelity organization and
are subject to change at any time based upon market or other
conditions. Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update
such views. These views may not be relied on as investment
advice and, because investment decisions for a Fidelity fund
are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an
indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity fund.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Investing involves risk, including risk of loss.
Stock markets, especially foreign markets, are volatile and
can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer,
political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
In general the bond market is volatile, and bond funds entail
interest rate risk. (As interest rates rise, bond prices
usually fall, and vice versa. This effect is usually more
pronounced for longer-term securities.) Bond funds also entail
the risk of issuer or counterparty default, issuer credit
risk, and inflation risk.
Changes in real estate values or economic conditions can have
a positive or negative effect on issuers in the real estate
industry, which may affect a fund containing real estate
investments.
1. TIPS are designed to track changes in the monthly Consumer
Price Index (CPI), as reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics. If the CPI rises, the securities’ principal, or
face value, increases. The coupon rate for TIPS is constant,
but generates higher interest when the inflation-adjusted
principal rises. When the securities mature, investors get
back the CPI-adjusted principal.
Inflation is represented by the Consumer Price Index for All
Urban Consumers (CPI-U), not seasonally adjusted, as
calculated by Ibbotson Associates. CPI-U is a broad measure of
the rate of change of consumer goods prices and is calculated
by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
Ibbotson Associates estimates the most current month by taking
the average CPI-U rate of the previous two months. Source:
Ibbotson Associates; U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics; data from January 1926 to May 2010.
Large-cap stocks are represented by the Standard &
Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500®). The S&P 500 is an
unmanaged market capitalization-weighted index of 500 common
stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group
representation to represent U.S. equity performance. Prior to
March 1957 the index consisted of only 90 of the largest
stocks. Source: Ibbotson Associates; Standard and Poor’s;
data from January 1926 to May 2010.
Small-cap stocks are represented by the Ibbotson Associates
U.S. Small Company Stock series from January 1926 to December
1978 and the Russell 2000 Index thereafter. The Small Company
Stock return series is composed of stocks making up the fifth
quintile of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The Russell
2000® Index is an unmanaged market capitalization-weighted
index of 2,000 small company stocks of U.S. domiciled
companies. Source: Ibbotson Associates; Frank Russell.
High-yield bonds are represented by the Barclays U.S.
Corporate High Yield Index from January 1926 to August 1986,
the Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Index from
September 1986 to December 1996, and the Merrill Lynch U.S.
High Yield Master II Constrained Index thereafter. Source:
Ibbotson Associates; Barclays Capital; Merrill Lynch. The
Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Index is an unmanaged
market-value-weighted index of all domestic and Yankee
high-yield bonds, including deferred interest bonds and
payment-in-kind securities. The Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield
Master II Constrained Index is a market value-weighted index
of all domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds, including
deferred interest bonds and payment-in-kind securities. It
limits any individual issuer to a maximum of 2% benchmark
exposure.
Long-term corporate bonds are represented by the Ibbotson
Associates Long-Term Corporate Bond series from January 1926
to December 1972 and the Barclays Capital U.S. Long Credit
Index thereafter. The Barclays Capital Long Credit Bond Index
is an unmanaged market value-weighted performance benchmark
for corporate fixed-rate debt issues with maturities greater
than 10 years. Source: Ibbotson Associates; Barclays Capital.
Intermediate-term government bonds are represented by the
Ibbotson Associates Intermediate-Term Government Bond series
from January 1926 to December 1972 and the Barclays Capital
Intermediate Treasury Index thereafter. The Barclays Index
includes all publicly issued, U.S. Treasury securities that
have a remaining maturity of greater than or equal to 1 year
and less than 10 years, are rated investment grade, and have
$250 million or more of outstanding face value. Source:
Ibbotson Associates; Barclays Capital.
Treasury bills are represented by the Ibbotson Associates U.S.
30-Day Treasury Bill series from January 1926 to December 1990
and the Barclays Capital 1–3 Month Treasury Bill Index
thereafter. The Barclay Capital Treasury Bill Index includes
all publicly issued zero-coupon United States Treasury bills
that have a remaining maturity of less than three months and
more than one month, are rated investment grade, and have $250
million or more of outstanding face value. Source: Ibbotson
Associates; Barclays Capital.
Commodities are represented by the S&P/Goldman Sachs
Commodity Index (S&P GSCI®) from January 1970 to December
1990 and the Dow Jones-UBS Commodity Index thereafter. The
S&P GSCI is a composite index of commodity sector returns
representing an unleveraged, long-only investment in commodity
futures that is broadly diversified across the spectrum of
commodities. The Dow Jones-UBS Commodity Index is a broadly
diversified index that allows investors to track commodity
futures through a single, simple measure. It is composed of
futures contracts on physical commodities.
Foreign stocks are represented by the Morgan Stanley Capital
International Europe, Australasia and Far East (MSCI EAFE)
Index, which is an unmanaged market capitalization-weighted
index of equity securities of companies domiciled in various
countries. The index is designed to represent performance of
developed stock markets outside the United States and Canada
and excludes certain market segments unavailable to U.S.-based
investors.
Real estate securities are represented by the FTSE NAREIT
Equity REIT Index from January 1972 to December 1977 and the
Dow Jones U.S. Select Real Estate Securities Index thereafter.
The FTSE NAREIT Equity Index is an unmanaged index
representing equity REITs. The Dow Jones U.S. Select Real
Estate Securities Index measures U.S. publicly traded real
estate securities. It screens for market cap, liquidity and
percentage of revenue derived from ownership and operation of
real estate securities. Source: Ibbotson Associates; FTSE; Dow
Jones.
TIPS are represented by the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury
Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) Index from March 1997 to
January 1999 and the Barclays Capital 1–10 Year U.S.
Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) Index
thereafter. Source: Ibbotson Associates; Barclays Capital.
All indexes are unmanaged and performance of the indexes
include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless
otherwise noted. The indexes are not illustrative of any
particular investment and it is not possible to invest
directly in an index.
Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem
Street, Smithfield, RI 02917.
555361.1.1